================================================ Subject: RE: [ Creed Discuss ] Looks like michele won the cookie From: "Debbi" To: "'The New Improved Less Lame List'" Date: Mon 8 Jul 2002 11:30:26 -0700 ================================================ Pay attention to the fucking thread and you'll figure it out. You're good like that. -----Original Message----- From: Joe Earles [mailto:earles@attbi.com] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:30 AM To: The New Improved Less Lame List Subject: Re: [ Creed Discuss ] Looks like michele won the cookie Which Kim? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Debbi" To: "'The New Improved Less Lame List'" Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:26 PM Subject: RE: [ Creed Discuss ] Looks like michele won the cookie > Great question! If you're looking for serious answers, blinders like > Kim's are a pretty good start. > > -----Original Message----- > From: blonde_skylight@juno.com [mailto:blonde_skylight@juno.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:32 PM > To: creed-discuss@debbir.com > Subject: Re: [ Creed Discuss ] Looks like michele won the cookie > > > Ok then, why do only about 3 people see Weathered as the > "rush-to-market" album that it most definitely was and why does the > rest of the confused world refuse to see the colossal potential in the > album that wasn't realized? > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:58:05 -0700 "Debbi" > writes: > > Really. I'd rather talk about why only about 3 people see weathered > > as the "rush to market" album that it was and why the rest of the > > world > > refuses to see the colossal potential in the album that wasn't > > realized. > > > > > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: > http://www.debbir.com/lists/Creed-discuss.htm To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.debbir.com/lists/Creed-discuss.htm To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.debbir.com/lists/Creed-discuss.htm